Businesses upbeat on U.S.-Taiwan dialogue, but say BTA the real prize

11/21/2020 07:56 PM
To activate the text-to-speech service, please first agree to the privacy policy below.
Photo courtesy of Taiwan
Photo courtesy of Taiwan's representative office in the U.S.

Taipei, Nov. 21 (CNA) Representatives of Taiwan's business community have praised the first U.S.-Taiwan Economic Prosperity Partnership (EPP) Dialogue, with many anticipating benefits for the semiconductor sector, but said negotiating a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) should remain the top priority.

Taiwan and the U.S. held their first talks under the new dialogue in Washington D.C. on Friday.

After the session, the two sides signed a five-year memorandum of understanding (MOU) and established teams to tackle issues related to global health security, science and technology, infrastructure and energy, supply chain restructuring, investment screening, and 5G.

They also released a fact sheet highlighting areas of planned economic cooperation.

It drew much attention in Taiwan for its confirmation that "strategic cooperation on the semiconductor industry is a mutual priority given its potential to generate significant, long-term benefits for both economies."

Li Yu-chia (李育家), chairman of the National Association of Small and Medium Enterprise, said the reference showed that Taiwan's semiconductor industry is not only vital to the domestic economy, but also a major asset to the U.S., and could spur bilateral cooperation in other industries.

Similarly, Ray Yang (楊瑞臨), director of the Industrial Technology Research Institute's (ITRI) Industrial Economics and Knowledge Center, said closer cooperation with the U.S. could help Taiwanese semiconductor firms address their talent shortages and gain access to new clients.

In addition to attracting U.S. engineering talent, the companies could also get involved in the development of defense technologies, an industry in which the U.S. is a global leader, Yang said.

Others, however, argued that the non-binding MOU and the largely aspirational commitments would produce few tangible benefits.

"If the U.S. really wants to help Taiwan, it should sign a bilateral trade or investment agreement," said Lin Por-fong (林伯豐), chairman of the Chinese National Association of Industry and Commerce.

On the political side, former Kuomintang (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that while "any progress in the bilateral relationship is a good thing," the government should also avoid using the dialogue to "score political points."

Economic talks conducted with the State Department are not the same as trade negotiations with the U.S. Trade Representative's Office, Chu said, adding that without achieving trade objectives, the significance of the dialogue is mainly political.

The government pushed back on that argument, however, stating that the EPP Dialogue was never intended to touch on trade issues, which are handled through the U.S.-Taiwan Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA).

On that issue, Foreign Minister Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) said, some 50 U.S. senators recently wrote to the U.S. Trade Representative's Office to call for the beginning of negotiations on a trade agreement with Taiwan.

The discussion of a BTA stems from the recent decision by Taiwan's government to lift a ban on U.S. pork imports containing the controversial leanness-enhancing feed additive ractopamine, removing what the U.S. had long cited as an obstacle to beginning bilateral trade talks.

(By Yu Hsiang, Liu Kuan-ting, Yang Shu-ching and Matthew Mazzetta)


    We value your privacy.
    Focus Taiwan (CNA) uses tracking technologies to provide better reading experiences, but it also respects readers' privacy. Click here to find out more about Focus Taiwan's privacy policy. When you close this window, it means you agree with this policy.